Probably would call for a MAP Adjuster upgrade though, so you'd get the right Air/Fuel Mix along with the better flow.
There shouldn't be any need for this unless you are putting more fuel into the motor. The only thing this is gonna do is increase the flow by taking out the rough edges. It will just improve mileage and performance if anything and will help if you do any intake or exhaust work. But if it was to change its Air/Fuel mixture, the 2.5L already runs rich from the factory anyways so you might just fix that problem by porting and polishing.
Ask YJmechanic about it. He has built a 200hp 2.5L a couple years back and his is doing excellent. ]
Without controlled tests this is speculation (and I'll include myself in this speculator category
). But, more air flow needs more fuel flow to maintain the same ratio. There's that little problem with Jeep using the MAP and IAT sensors to determine fuel flow instead of MAF, at least on the 2.5s in the YJ and TJ. What porting and polishing on a 2.5L will do to Manifold pressure and readings from the MAP is a question seeking an answer. I speculate that the engine would take in more air as a result of the porting/polishing, but manifold pressue would stay constant (or decline as a result of the greater airflow aft of the MAP sensor?) meaning fuel flow would stay constant (or decline?) despite the air flow increase to the cylinders. The only way to restore the air/fuel ratio would seem to be a MAP adjuster.
But, if it turns out the MAP Adjuster is unnecessary for internal mods, I'd be interested in getting a porting and polishing job done down at my favorite shop in Orange County.
Note: I take it YJ mechanic is not using a MAP Adjuster on his 200hp 2.5L, right?