Author Topic: double stacked tbs  (Read 1761 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tall Boy

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« on: September 15, 2006, 11:55:58 PM »
Anybody ever heard or done a double stacked throttle body spacer. I ain't too sure if it wasn't sarcasm but somebody said if it were double stacked it's like double-mint gum.

YJmechanic

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2006, 05:50:07 AM »
that would be hard to rig up with the cables and if it ran properly which may or may not you would have no torrque left.  that is like running a giant single plain intake on an old street rod.  I wouldn't suggest it unless you just want to waste time playing around.

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
double stacked tbs
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2006, 12:24:45 PM »
You can stack the smaller ones.  They are more like 1/4" shims then spacers.  You would not want to stack 1" spacers though.  The reason for using the smaller spacers is to fine tune the pulse wave and get optimal induction.  It's the pulse wave that is important so just adding more and more spacers will not help.  You need to time the pulse wave so it comes into the intake and hits the top of the valves right when they open. Then the valve closes the wave heads back out.

BTW: the pulse wave also occures at the exhaust which is why you cna tune the exhaust to optimise the pulse wave.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

wrangler387

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2006, 03:59:52 PM »
If the jeeps intake manifold was equal length then tuning for pulse wave would probably work. And its more to do with runner length then plenum size that determines about what small RPM the X wave will be effective (X being whichever degree wave your looking to utilize [the less times it bounces back and forth the stronger the pulse]). Helmholtz resonator formulas might not have even went into play designing the jeep manifold... although timing it right does provide a decent boost in efficiency, its only for a small section of rpm and is somtimes ignored.  Most people don't look into tuning the exaust either, if they did we wouldn't have short runner'd exaust manifolds on our jeeps. most of the exaust benefits come from creating a "scavenging" effect, which is also kind've neglected in jeeps.

YJmechanic

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2006, 06:21:25 PM »
WOW this went way further than I expected for a little question but that's what's great here is everybody comes together adds info.

John Do Daddy-O

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2006, 11:58:36 PM »
I saw the same thread where somebody thought that if a 1" spacer is good, two should be twice as good. Being mechanically illiterate, I thought "Makes sense to me!" I found some cheap ones on e-bay (had to replace my original because I tried to grind it outmyself .. sad..very, very sad) I bought two and installed them.

I can't say I found any substantial increase in performance, but it works at least as well as it did before. But i would say that knowing what I know now, I wouldn't do it again.

Tall Boy

  • Guest
double stacked tbs
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2006, 09:45:00 PM »
Right on.