Author Topic: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.  (Read 2498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« on: September 19, 2010, 03:55:14 PM »
Last Updated: September 18. 2010 1:00AM
'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
Automakers look to system to meet fuel-saving demands
Alisa Priddle / The Detroit News

The stage is set for a relatively simple and inexpensive fuel-saving technology to proliferate on vehicles in North America.

So-called "start-stop" systems turn off a car when it is idling and reignite the engine when the driver releases the brake.

Advertisement

The technology is widespread in Europe and is poised to expand in the United States and Canada in the next five years, as automakers look for every tool in the box to meet increasingly stringent fuel-economy and emissions requirements.

Estimates vary, but the consensus is shutting off the engine at a stop can improve fuel economy as much as 15 percent. And its affordability should make it accessible to the car-buying masses.

"Engineers kill for one-tenth of a mile per gallon," said Joe Phillippi of AutoTrends Consulting Inc. in Short Hills, N.J. " In city driving, it would make a huge impact."

The technology already is prevalent in Europe on vehicles with manual transmissions. In North America, less than 10 percent of buyers drive a manual -- which means the start-stop technology must be adapted to work with cars most Americans drive.

Another challenge is consumer acceptance.

"It is a strange sensation because the engine suddenly turns off," said analyst Stephanie Brinley of EMC Strategic Communications in Troy. "It is quick and seamless, but you can tell it happens."

Automakers say the technology would be accepted here more readily if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency changes testing procedures because some of the agency's tests don't have many stops and therefore don't recognize its full benefits.

But none of the obstacles appears insurmountable, and many automakers have the system in their near-term product plans.

"I think most vehicles will have that capability going forward," said Jeff Jowett, principal analyst with IHS Automotive in Northville. He forecasts steady growth of the technology.

Half of the new cars in Europe will have start/stop technology in 2012 and North America will reach that figure in 2016, said Frank Frister, product manager with Bosch North America.

Suppliers such as Bosch and ZF Group are adapting the technology for automatic transmissions.

Hydraulic pressure must be maintained to send power to the wheels when the engine restarts. Solutions include an electric auxiliary pump or an accumulator to retain pressure when the engine is off.

The solutions are expected to trigger mass production of start-stop systems in the near term.

The only start-stop system offered in the United States today is on the Porsche Panamera, but that vehicle doesn't have a traditional automatic transmission.

BMW AG made the technology standard on vehicles with manual transmissions in Europe. It will debut on an undisclosed U.S. vehicle with an automatic transmission next year, said Frank Baloga, vice president of engineering for BMW Group North America.

It is still a work in progress, however, and has limitations.

The driver must keep a foot on the brake and not turn the wheels for a set time for the engine to shut off, Baloga said. And the system will only work if the temperature is between 39 and 85 degrees, so the engine is not needed to heat or cool the interior.
What's up next

Ford Motor Co. may be next to the plate, with plans to offer the technology as early as 2012 on U.S. vehicles with manual transmissions -- about 4 percent of Ford sales -- and on automatics, spokesman Richard Truett said.

Chrysler Group LLC offers start-stop in Europe and will introduce it in North America by 2014, according to the automaker's five-year plan.

"To bring it to the U.S. is more challenging to match it with an automatic transmission," said Chrysler powertrain chief Paolo Ferrero.

Chrysler is spending $300 million at its Kokomo, Ind., facility to make an eight-speed transmission licensed from ZF, starting in 2013. The ZF transmission has the pressure accumulator needed for start-stop technology.

The Auburn Hills-based automaker will introduce eight-speeds on the 2011 Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger but won't confirm if the cars initially will have start-stop.

General Motors Co. first showed the potential of the technology in 2006 on the Saturn Vue "mild hybrid," a gas-electric vehicle that relies on the gas engine for propulsion. Start-stop was part of a larger package of fuel-saving technologies.

The vehicles went out of production in 2009, but second-generation mild hybrids are due next year, said Larry Nitz, executive director of hybrid and electric powertrain engineering.

GM eventually will offer start-stop capability without the rest of the trappings of the mild hybrid system, Nitz said.

He sees the capability as important enough that it will spread across the industry. "There will be a big uptick in North America for the fuel economy and we will be part of it."

As the clock ticks to meet tougher corporate fuel economy standards in 2016, "everything will be thrown at it," Ford's Truett said. "Start-stop will be part of that."

One advantage is that it is low-cost technology because most of the components already are in the car; they may just need some modification, Frister said. "It is a low-hanging fruit."

Suppliers and analysts estimate the cost as low as $500.

"The cost will be considerably less than the least-expensive hybrid," Truett said.
Consumer acceptance

A larger question is whether customers will accept it, said Jim Hall, analyst with 2953 Analytics in Birmingham.

Justin Ward, advanced powertrain manager, Toyota Motor Sales USA, said the technology offers a good near-term benefit, but a full hybrid makes more sense: Drivers pay more, but they get more efficiency.

"I don't think people will shop looking for start-stop, but if it is good, they will brag to their friends that they have it," said James Bell, executive market analyst for Kelley Blue Book in Irvine, Calif. "There is nothing more efficient than a quiet car at a stop light."

apriddle@detnews.com (313) 222 - 2504


From The Detroit News: http://www.detnews.com/article/20100918/AUTO01/9180380/1148/auto01/-Start-stop--technology-headed-to-U.S.#ixzz100zRI09H
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Dylan

  • Guest
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2010, 08:05:23 PM »
Oh joy, let's add some more complexity to a car so there's something else to potentially go wrong and have to be troubleshot and fixed.   :brick:

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2010, 08:40:40 PM »
Oh joy, let's add some more complexity to a car so there's something else to potentially go wrong and have to be troubleshot and fixed.   :brick:
It wouldn't really be more complicated as the main parts required are already in place.  I think for a off-road vehicle they would need a switch to turn it off road though.

15% increase in mileage is pretty damn big.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline chardrc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3535
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2010, 09:29:04 AM »
15% increase in mileage is pretty damn big.

i think they could get that if they actually synchronized the tragic lights around here so you don't start stop wait 2 minuted then go every .25 mile... :fish:
1990 YJ 4cly, ax5, 2.5 inch BDS lift, 31 MTr\'s,  Powertrax-lockers all around, track-bars removed, boomerang shackles, warn m8000 winch, electric fan. [sold but not forgotten]

2007 jk Rubicon 2dr

Offline chrisfranklin

  • 4BangerJP.comŽ Donator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1276
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2010, 03:03:25 PM »
I'd be in to stop/start tech.  Crossed my mind ever time my jeep has been idling behind an Insight or Prius in the last decade.
'94 YJ S 5spd, Borla Exhaust, CarSound Cat., PS Ceramic-coated Headers, Airraid intake, 62mm TB, Intake Manifold bored/ceramic-coated, 19lb injectors, Sharp's Adj. FPR, MeanGreen Starter, D30 Aussie locker, 31" Destination MTs, Warn XD9000, Cibie headlights, armor

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2010, 03:32:35 PM »
I'd be in to stop/start tech.  Crossed my mind ever time my jeep has been idling behind an Insight or Prius in the last decade.
Yeah, but you'd have to buy a new Jeep to get it.   :lol:

Now if they could retrofit it, I'd consider that but otherwise, I'm not buying another Jeep.    :finger:
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

BigCountry

  • Guest
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2010, 05:36:57 PM »
i think i would have too much trouble getting used to that system. i would stop, the engine would shut off, and i would think i was an  :asshat: and stalled it, try to turn it over again, wreck the system, go explain it, get it fixed and after dropping big dimes, i would truly be an  :asshat:

Bikerjr1

  • Guest
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2010, 03:06:41 PM »
When I hear or read about some new gizmo to make better fuel mileage I think back to when I was 15-18 and running round with my friends.  We had in our group a bunch of different cars and trucks, Ford, Olds, Chevy, Dodge etc.  The ones that stood out we my 55 F-100 and my best friends 56 Olds 88 holiday Coupe.  both of our vehicles were 100% stock.  My truck had a 223 I6 with Ford-O-Matic tranny 3.92 rear gear.  His 56 Olds had a 324 V8 Auto w/overdrive and factory A/C.  I could count on 20+mpg on the Hwy, he would get 24-26 all day long.  These were not light vehicles.  I still find it hard to believe that every time they add some new gizmo to increase mileage they can't get it done without adding another computer bank to the car.  Strip them down, put the metal where it should be, make it simple as far as the engine/tranny.  Then see what the mileage looks like.  I would rather have fenders and frames and body panels that will WITHSTAND a blow than ones that are ment to squish up.  AND if I want computer controlled this and that make it an option along with the other crap like air bags.  I bet that the weight of the vehicle could be dropped a 1000#s.  I know that I would rather have a 150-200#s of chrome front bumper protecting me than a plastic front end.  Maybe I'm just getting old but I don't think I'd like a car that turns it self off in the middle of traffic.  I better get an extra tow strap for the Jeep for these cars to drag them the heck outta my way.
JR

BigCountry

  • Guest
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2010, 03:39:35 PM »
  I better get an extra tow strap for the Jeep for these cars to drag them the heck outta my way.
JR

or just get a sick lift, rockwells, and 46s and just drive over them  :guns:  :twofingers:

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2010, 04:30:49 PM »
When I hear or read about some new gizmo to make better fuel mileage I think back to when I was 15-18 and running round with my friends.  We had in our group a bunch of different cars and trucks, Ford, Olds, Chevy, Dodge etc.  The ones that stood out we my 55 F-100 and my best friends 56 Olds 88 holiday Coupe.  both of our vehicles were 100% stock.  My truck had a 223 I6 with Ford-O-Matic tranny 3.92 rear gear.  His 56 Olds had a 324 V8 Auto w/overdrive and factory A/C.  I could count on 20+mpg on the Hwy, he would get 24-26 all day long.  These were not light vehicles.  I still find it hard to believe that every time they add some new gizmo to increase mileage they can't get it done without adding another computer bank to the car.  Strip them down, put the metal where it should be, make it simple as far as the engine/tranny.  Then see what the mileage looks like.  I would rather have fenders and frames and body panels that will WITHSTAND a blow than ones that are ment to squish up.  AND if I want computer controlled this and that make it an option along with the other crap like air bags.  I bet that the weight of the vehicle could be dropped a 1000#s.  I know that I would rather have a 150-200#s of chrome front bumper protecting me than a plastic front end.  Maybe I'm just getting old but I don't think I'd like a car that turns it self off in the middle of traffic.  I better get an extra tow strap for the Jeep for these cars to drag them the heck outta my way.
JR
You do realize that those old cars weren't that safe right?

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/joMK1WZjP7g?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/joMK1WZjP7g?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US</a>
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 04:32:46 PM by Jeffy »
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline chardrc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3535
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2010, 05:18:08 PM »
they should make the drivers smarter and let the dumb ones die in their crashes.. although the dumb ones tend to take an innocent down with them/ tend to be the lucky ones...  :rant: like people buying a car because it has more airbags. seams dumb to me to buy a car purly because it has 2 more airbags... 
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 05:19:33 PM by chardrc »
1990 YJ 4cly, ax5, 2.5 inch BDS lift, 31 MTr\'s,  Powertrax-lockers all around, track-bars removed, boomerang shackles, warn m8000 winch, electric fan. [sold but not forgotten]

2007 jk Rubicon 2dr

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2010, 05:54:49 PM »
they should make the drivers smarter and let the dumb ones die in their crashes.. although the dumb ones tend to take an innocent down with them/ tend to be the lucky ones...  :rant: like people buying a car because it has more airbags. seams dumb to me to buy a car purly because it has 2 more airbags... 
Unless you're in an accident where those two airbags would have saved you.   :lol:
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Bikerjr1

  • Guest
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2010, 07:58:17 PM »
Jeffy,  I happened to be in an accident just about like the one in that video.  Some guy crossed the center and caught my 1955 F-100 straight in the front quarter.  I was going about 35-40 and he a little faster.  He was in a car simmilar to the malibu,  this was in 1981.  The front bumper took most of the impact, the front fender needed some repair work and the grill backing on that side too.  All in all about 1100.00.  his car was totaled.  My truck had the plain c channel factory truck bumpers on it,  3/16" thick steel.  I could of driven the truck home but the front fender was into the tire and rim.  It took an hydraulic ram to get it off the rim.  I wish I could find the pictures of the wreck.  This is just my personal experience, others may very.
JR

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S.
« Reply #13 on: October 01, 2010, 08:25:01 PM »
Jeffy,  I happened to be in an accident just about like the one in that video.  Some guy crossed the center and caught my 1955 F-100 straight in the front quarter.  I was going about 35-40 and he a little faster.  He was in a car simmilar to the malibu,  this was in 1981.  The front bumper took most of the impact, the front fender needed some repair work and the grill backing on that side too.  All in all about 1100.00.  his car was totaled.  My truck had the plain c channel factory truck bumpers on it,  3/16" thick steel.  I could of driven the truck home but the front fender was into the tire and rim.  It took an hydraulic ram to get it off the rim.  I wish I could find the pictures of the wreck.  This is just my personal experience, others may very.
JR
That's not comparable.  A 1981 was when everyone was making cars out of recycled pop cans.  Quality was at an all time low as well.  You can't say a 1981 represents all later model cars.  Even 90's cars are as safe as they are today.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."