I think that you won't need a CV style shaft, the local jeep shop has told me that they get better angles out of standard style DS and they are less problematic. ....snip....
This is sort of a misleading statement. It all depends on the ujoint and the yoke used. The ujoint is designed to withstand torque through the use of material. The thicker the material, the larger the torque value. Then there is the cap. The cap holds the needle bearings onto the trunion. The thickness of the trunion is based on the torque value. The yoke for the ujoint is designed to hold the ujoint caps and to withstand predetermined amount of torque designed for the ujoint. (Would be pretty stupid to have a strong joint and weak yoke or other way around.) This torque is accepted through the amount of material used to hold the cap. With more material to hold a specified sized cap, the less 'angle' clearance there can be designed into the yoke for the cap and the center of the ujoint. Take a look at your steering joints on the front axle. If you were to remove the steering stops, you may hit the center of the joint onto the yoke when turning. This is why there are steering stops (not worrying about the tires interference).
So for a given operating angle, a single ujoint has limits. However, if you want/need a great angle, doubling up ujoints splits the angle between them. Thus, the constant velocity (cv) joint would be an option. This is all relative to the setup of the particular vehicle. CVs are also designed differently. IFS has a different cv design for the axle compared to a cv for a ds. CVs can be designed to go to greater angles and operate consistently at those angles with little problem with vibrations.
Last to mention, cvs can provide a better and smoother operation in the shafts at the operating angles. Thus the name, constant velocity. U-joints have a problem operating at angles and this is due to the travel of the trunion.