260cfm at 6000 rpm ideal (that means if you have no losses which is 100% VE and that never happens) - the way to calculate is
2.5L or 150 cubic inches total engine displacement => since is a 4 stroke/4 cyl it means it will require 1/2 of that for 1 rotation (2 rotations for a full cycle). So first translate the cu.in. displacement in cubic feet by dividing with 12^3 (1'x1'x1'=12''x12''x12'') = 1728 and multiply the result by the top rpm (i used 6000) - divide the result by 2 (2 full rotations for a full engine cycle).
so it's something like this (displacement_in_cu_ft/2)*rpm=260.4cfm
EDIT: you can approximate the VE for the Jeep engine with about 75% which means the actual requirement of the engine at 6000rpm is 260x0.75=195cfm, the more restrictive the intake the less VE, so by improving that you are actually increasing the VE which in turns means more air per cycle and ability to make more power.
just a bit more explanation here: your goal is to have minimal pressure drop at the required cfm - the pressure drop is related to pipe diameter, roughness coefficient (how smooth is the pipe inside) and the length of the pipe, so for longer pipes you want larger diameter, the smoother they are the better (mandrel bent aluminum, stainless or steel are best - cast plastic is rougher so it will have higher loss but you can get away with larger diameter). all the high perf filters have a cfm rating but the higher the number the better as it will result in less pressure loss which directly affects your VE - for example the difference between a 2'' pipe and a 2.5'' pipe for 20'' of length the pressure loss at 200cfm is 0.27psi, between 2.5 and 3'' is 0.05 psi - so the benefit of going to 3'' in this case is minimal, from 2 to 2.5 is more significant - of course there are other factors like couplers and bends - the smoother the whole assembly the less pressure loss and better airflow to the engine.
EDIT: using same parameters, the 1.5'' pipe vs 2.5'' pipe press drop difference is 0.9psi, going to 1.25'' gets the pressure drop difference compared to 2.5'' to 2.5psi for 200cfm - so you get the idea. The 2.5'' diam for Jeep seems the right compromise between the size and pressure drop, going to 3'' will not result in significant gains but at 2'' will be considered restrictive.