Author Topic: 4.0 TB?  (Read 2921 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline smashcoast

  • Member
  • Posts: 305
4.0 TB?
« on: January 22, 2010, 06:36:19 PM »
So i was thinking about getting Bounty Hunters little setup and Saw in the facts Fourbangers 62mm write up about cutting with the dremel.

My ? is  is that necessary? Will it improve that stup better?
Building this Jeep on the Cheap! Just like Chrysler!

Offline chardrc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3535
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2010, 06:39:51 PM »
you don't have to do it. but if you don't there will be a "lip" at the manifold because the hole in the manifold will be smaller than the bore of the tb. there is a write up on how to do it around here somewhere.. (ill do a quick search)

edit:

found it this is one way to do it... has pic on second page
http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php/topic,7428.15.html
« Last Edit: January 22, 2010, 06:41:36 PM by chardrc »
1990 YJ 4cly, ax5, 2.5 inch BDS lift, 31 MTr\'s,  Powertrax-lockers all around, track-bars removed, boomerang shackles, warn m8000 winch, electric fan. [sold but not forgotten]

2007 jk Rubicon 2dr

Offline dwtaylorpdx

  • Member
  • Posts: 1038
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2010, 06:54:18 PM »
There is no point in doing the swap if you don't cut the lip out.

Dave
94 YJ - 2.5 Hesco Cam B&B Ported - AX5 Trans w/Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch - 4" Rough Country Lift W/Skyjacker Shocks - D44 Rear/ARB - D30/ARB - ARB Compressor - Warn M8000 in Custom Bumper - Reunell Rear Bumper - Metalcloak 6" Body Armor Kit - Tuffy Console - 265x85-16 Tires - 2M Radio

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2010, 09:16:06 PM »
if you don't enlarge the opening in the manifold is better to go with a plain 4.0L t/b as it matches the manifold. like Dave said, no point in going to the 62mm then and with a 4.0 will actually be better as it tapers down gradually and will accelerate smoother - if you flip a 4.0 t/b and start opening the butterfly slowly you'll see what i mean
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline dwtaylorpdx

  • Member
  • Posts: 1038
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2010, 11:17:37 PM »
My 4.0 stock TB required some relief of the hole as well,
I think there is a lot of slack in the diameter of the manifold hole.

Dave
94 YJ - 2.5 Hesco Cam B&B Ported - AX5 Trans w/Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch - 4" Rough Country Lift W/Skyjacker Shocks - D44 Rear/ARB - D30/ARB - ARB Compressor - Warn M8000 in Custom Bumper - Reunell Rear Bumper - Metalcloak 6" Body Armor Kit - Tuffy Console - 265x85-16 Tires - 2M Radio

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2010, 11:30:06 PM »
My 4.0 stock TB required some relief of the hole as well,
I think there is a lot of slack in the diameter of the manifold hole.

Dave

interesting, mine was right on the money (or at leasti don't recall doing anything but mind you was a long time ago so i might be wrong)
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline Bounty Hunter

  • Member
  • Posts: 1658
    • http://www.sija.org
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2010, 01:45:41 AM »
There is one benefit to the 62mm throttle body if you decide not to open up the intake manifold to 62mm, and that is the large increase in throttle response.  The 62mm TB does not have the taper beneath the throttle plate as found in the stock 2.5L and 4.0L throttle bodies.  The removal of this taper allows air past the throttle plate immediately, for lighting quick throttle response.  A very noticeable improvement.

Torch_Ind

  • Guest
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2010, 06:13:07 PM »
I have a 64mm tb and had to enlarge it to match also gasket matched the intake to the manifold.

Offline smashcoast

  • Member
  • Posts: 305
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2010, 08:56:01 PM »
Quote
There is one benefit to the 62mm throttle body if you decide not to open up the intake manifold to 62mm, and that is the large increase in throttle response.  The 62mm TB does not have the taper beneath the throttle plate as found in the stock 2.5L and 4.0L throttle bodies.  The removal of this taper allows air past the throttle plate immediately, for lighting quick throttle response.  A very noticeable improvement.

So are you saying that you need to open the manifold up?
Building this Jeep on the Cheap! Just like Chrysler!

Offline smashcoast

  • Member
  • Posts: 305
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2010, 09:09:17 PM »
Also I use all of the sensors from my old TB right? AIS and Map they will just fit right in?
Building this Jeep on the Cheap! Just like Chrysler!

Offline Bounty Hunter

  • Member
  • Posts: 1658
    • http://www.sija.org
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2010, 09:20:31 PM »
So are you saying that you need to open the manifold up?
I'm saying you should open your manifold up, but it's not necessary to still gain 'some' benefit from the 62mm TB.


Yes, you reuse all your sensors including the IAC housing (attached with 4 tamper-proof torx).


Offline smashcoast

  • Member
  • Posts: 305
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2010, 09:23:58 PM »
Ok. i will be contacting you soon.
Building this Jeep on the Cheap! Just like Chrysler!

Offline FourbangerYJ

  • Servicing Squirrels Since 1995®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3372
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2010, 12:06:30 PM »
If you don't have a Dremmel type tool. A rotary rasp on a drill will work pretty fast on the Al. They can be had at the hardware store for a few bucks, they come in a few shapes.
Scott~

Using tools you have not used in a while is like shaking hands with old friends. :nod:

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2010, 12:50:20 PM »
this is what i think Bounty is referring to about the throttle response (so Bounty please let me know if i got it right):
the 4.0L t/b is tapered down once past the butterfly - the purpose of that taper is to give more control on the acceleration at very low throttle opening, what it does is basically limit your throttle opening to only half of the t/b diameter (only the 1/2 of the butterfly that moves upwards will actually open, the lower half would follow the taper closely so until you reach about 1/4 opening it will not contribute at all (or very little). the 4.0 t/b is about 60mm at the top and around 55mm or so at the bottom. the 62mm t/b has the same diameter throughout (same with the bored out 4.0L t/b - it is 60mm top to bottom) - so w/o the taper your throttle will increase more between idle and 1/4 opening giving you more airflow per degree of rotation at the butterfly shaft.

imho, if you get the 62 you should enlarge the opening as at wot (or close to that) is where it will actually make a difference compared to the stock 4.0
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline dwtaylorpdx

  • Member
  • Posts: 1038
Re: 4.0 TB?
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2010, 02:40:31 PM »
One easy way to get the hole in the intake manifold
to the size you want is to find a hole saw that barely
fits through the Spacer. Then bolt the spacer on without
the throttle body and use the spacer as a guide to saw
the hole to size. I used a hole saw that actually took
about .005 out of the  spacer and it worked great,
matching hole clear through and the stock 4.0 TB engine side is
like .005 smaller which I think is acceptable for this purpose..

I followed up with a burr in a drill to take some obvious unequal
areas out and kind of dress the manifold to finish it off.

As I've posted about before what I noticed was not a power increase,
but more of a change in where power is at in the power band.
The 1" spacer I'm using moved the torque/HP band down about 600 RPM.
Which put me having nice pull off power at 2000 and flattening out around 5000.
Without the spacer it was higher in the power band. Engine is Hesco cammed B&B'd
and I'm running a paper filter but I have all the restrictive bits pulled out of the intake path.

Wish I'd had time to do some dyno work when I built
the motor I'd have tried the with and without to see.
Dave
94 YJ - 2.5 Hesco Cam B&B Ported - AX5 Trans w/Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch - 4" Rough Country Lift W/Skyjacker Shocks - D44 Rear/ARB - D30/ARB - ARB Compressor - Warn M8000 in Custom Bumper - Reunell Rear Bumper - Metalcloak 6" Body Armor Kit - Tuffy Console - 265x85-16 Tires - 2M Radio