Author Topic: 37's?  (Read 4752 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 37's?
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2011, 11:05:26 AM »
ya i might just go with a nice 4inch long arm with 35's hopefully that will still do the job at the rubicon haha
You don't even really need 35's for the Rubicon.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

RT

  • Guest
Re: 37's?
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2011, 11:39:44 AM »
You don't even really need 35's for the Rubicon.

Ya dude, remember the Rubicon Tj's can clear the Rubicon trail and they're only on 31's, you'll only gain 1inch of clearance per 2 inches of tire diameter increase. And that add's a LOT of weight. If you're looking to get through the Rubicon or some of the Moab trails than I'd just go w/d44's with really deep gears and 33's with a big lift.

Offline jfrabat

  • Gargantuan Mango Tree Mechanic®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3676
  • Finally USING the Jeep!
Re: 37's?
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2011, 06:35:09 PM »
You don't even really need 35's for the Rubicon.

Someone here ran the Rubicon on 31's or so, right?
'94 YJ 2.5L with 4" RE lift, Superwinch EPi9.0, FoMoCo e-Fan, SD30 and SD35 w/ARB-5.13, 165A alt., 33" BFG KM2 on 15" AR wheels, Sony sound system, Pavement Ends Hardtop, Hydroboost

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 37's?
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2011, 08:49:40 PM »
Someone here ran the Rubicon on 31's or so, right?
Jeep used to.  From 1991-ish to 2003 the Wrangler was used and they only upgraded the tires to 31's when stocks were 205, 215 or 225.  Chris ran the Rubicon with his 31's.  I've been with a group with 31's as well.  A YJ and a TJ both on street tires no aggressive AT's or even MT's.  No other mods are really required but some skid-plating would be recommended if you're not running any lift.  You definitely don't need 'big lift'.

The only exceptions would be Lil Sluice and Old Sluice.  But both of those can be bypassed.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

gcracker25

  • Guest
Re: 37's?
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2011, 09:53:59 AM »
ya that is very true my buddy just did the rubicon in his straight axled yota and hes just got 33's....When you say big lift how big we talking? like a long arm 4 or 6?

Offline chrisfranklin

  • 4BangerJP.com® Donator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1276
Re: 37's?
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2011, 09:28:06 PM »
Ya dude, remember the Rubicon Tj's can clear the Rubicon trail and they're only on 31's, you'll only gain 1inch of clearance per 2 inches of tire diameter increase. And that add's a LOT of weight. If you're looking to get through the Rubicon or some of the Moab trails than I'd just go w/d44's with really deep gears and 33's with a big lift.

I drove the Rubicon on 31s, w/a one inch shackle lift, stock axles and an aussie in the front, stock gears, stock transfer-case gearing, and a lot of new armor.  I was banging rocks the whole way for 12+ miles;  I was also driving probably the easiest lines the trail had.  

The crazy thing was on that trip, except for the end of the second day on the trail where we were able to get with a group of big TJs and built pickups for about a half-hour on the downhill to Rubicon Springs, we -- my Dad and I -- ended up running the Rubicon in a solo jeep. That's wasn't in the plans -- I figured end of summer, there'd be a ton of people there and lots of groups to get with from start to finish.  Didn't happen.  


Anyway, my guess is 33s or 35s would have given a lot more leeway in terms of line-selection and made the run a little less work.  But, it was doable on 31s...  If you've got a group to go with, then maybe get yourself at least some 33s and a 4 inch lift and then you can enjoy yourself.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 09:47:27 PM by chrisfranklin »
'94 YJ S 5spd, Borla Exhaust, CarSound Cat., PS Ceramic-coated Headers, Airraid intake, 62mm TB, Intake Manifold bored/ceramic-coated, 19lb injectors, Sharp's Adj. FPR, MeanGreen Starter, D30 Aussie locker, 31" Destination MTs, Warn XD9000, Cibie headlights, armor

gcracker25

  • Guest
Re: 37's?
« Reply #21 on: April 19, 2011, 12:00:29 PM »
sweet thanks everyone

Offline stan98tj

  • Empty Wallet Wheeling Since 2007®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
  • Wheeling New England
Re: 37's?
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2011, 03:27:32 PM »
i've often read about off road experts and enthusiasts sticking to the rule of "3" as in 3" lift and 33s. That seems to be the perfect balance to be able to tackle hard trails with all the while allowing for good on road manners. I don't know if you DD your jeep, but this at least lets you know that a tire even as "small" as a 33 is formidable on tough trails.
98 TJ 35"Maxxis Trep.Old Man Emu 2.5""+1"BL,IronMan Fab control arms,4.56gears,Ford 8.8+ARB,Currie/IronMan steering, WARN VR10,HP D30 sleeved+ RCV,Body Armor Rock Rails WISHLIST:TDi.Girlfriend hates it :) If you can read this don't flip me over i dont have any $$ left to fix it

gcracker25

  • Guest
Re: 37's?
« Reply #23 on: April 19, 2011, 05:39:19 PM »
oh trust me i have a 3inch lift with 33's and it can take almost anything on lol

Offline jfrabat

  • Gargantuan Mango Tree Mechanic®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3676
  • Finally USING the Jeep!
Re: 37's?
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2011, 09:01:25 PM »
oh trust me i have a 3inch lift with 33's and it can take almost anything on lol

How about this little example; notice the blue Jeep (I6 and 38 Boggers) stuck in the background...  Took 3 winches, a high lift, and a broken hub (D44) to get him out of this hole, and notice that with a bit of help from my winch , I got through...  You'll need better lane selection, but you can make it through 95% of the stuff out there on 33's!

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNtmAvqf9Uc?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/PNtmAvqf9Uc?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US</a>

Felipe

PS: Has anyone else noticed that youtube vids are now harder to post?
'94 YJ 2.5L with 4" RE lift, Superwinch EPi9.0, FoMoCo e-Fan, SD30 and SD35 w/ARB-5.13, 165A alt., 33" BFG KM2 on 15" AR wheels, Sony sound system, Pavement Ends Hardtop, Hydroboost

Offline aw12345

  • Member
  • Posts: 3065
    • my jeep picture page
Re: 37's?
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2011, 10:06:49 PM »
Hammers and 33's tires not gonna happen, some friends ran with us today on 35's and 36" superswampers and they both had a hell of a time getting stuck, rock stacking and winching
2006 Jeep Wrangler TJ SE
2004 Jeep Wrangler TJ SE

gcracker25

  • Guest
Re: 37's?
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2011, 10:20:59 AM »
I rock crawl not mud bog lol