Author Topic: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK  (Read 1495 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« on: August 29, 2011, 03:14:45 PM »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/hoCxunMgVfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/hoCxunMgVfw</a>

Jeep celebrates its 70th anniversary in 2011, and as we welcome the best Wrangler yet, we pay tribute to the original trail-rated truck. Though Jeep considers its birth year to be 1941, when the first military-spec Jeeps rolled off the line in Toledo, Ohio, the first Civilian Jeeps, or CJs, weren't available until 1945. This Model CJ2A is number 26, and cost $1200 new.

One of only a handful built with a column-shift "three-on-the-tree" three-speed manual transmission, this truck spends most of its time in the Chrysler collection, but it's led a full life. Jeep acquired it from an Indiana collector who had bought it from a school district that was using it to pull parade floats. Before undergoing a full restoration, it was said to have been covered in layers of house paint "an inch thick." Today, it looks just as it did when it rolled off the Willys-Overland production line 67 years ago.

It drives like it, too. Puttering around Motor Trend headquarters, the CJ was only slightly trickier to handle than a modern Wrangler. As in any old truck, there's a fair amount of play in the steering, and it never really tracks straight unless you keep sawing at the wheel. The column-mounted shifter takes a little getting used to, but it's the same H-pattern you'll find on any modern stickshift. Sure, the new Wrangler isn't temperamental on a cold-start, and you don't have to rev-match every downshift to keep from grinding the gears, but you adapt quickly to the CJ's quirks. The seats are actually quite plush, and the 60-horsepower L-head four-cylinder is enough to get the 2200-pound truck down the road. Even the transfer case operates nearly the same as in a new truck.

Easy to drive, easy to fix, nearly impossible to break -- one can see why not much has changed in the last 70 years

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/classic/features/1108_1945_jeep_cj2a_classic/#ixzz1WTb034pF







« Last Edit: August 29, 2011, 08:46:24 PM by Jeffy »
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline chardrc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3535
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2011, 08:15:48 PM »
not bad. would have been nice to see them drive the jeeps. must have been early enough to be a column shifter cj..
1990 YJ 4cly, ax5, 2.5 inch BDS lift, 31 MTr\'s,  Powertrax-lockers all around, track-bars removed, boomerang shackles, warn m8000 winch, electric fan. [sold but not forgotten]

2007 jk Rubicon 2dr

Offline grumpygy

  • Member
  • Posts: 882
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2011, 08:46:26 PM »
not bad. would have been nice to see them drive the jeeps. must have been early enough to be a column shifter cj..

There was a floor shifter.
94 YJ, Cool Air intake, 19lb Inj, 4.0 Throttlebody with spacer,  31/10.50/15's

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2011, 08:56:16 PM »
I'd rather have the '45.  Column shifters are cool and confuses though who aren't old enough or haven't ever driven one.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2011, 08:57:20 PM »
There was a floor shifter.
Nope, he's right.  The two shifters together are for the trasfer case.  The one further back is for the PTO.  The stick on the column is the shifter for the transmission.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline chardrc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3535
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2011, 09:57:17 PM »
never driven a column shifter manual before. our 4.3l v6 CJ2a project originally had the column shifter trans but Po left the trans without the top plate on so the internals are all shot. and all the linkages are gone.
1990 YJ 4cly, ax5, 2.5 inch BDS lift, 31 MTr\'s,  Powertrax-lockers all around, track-bars removed, boomerang shackles, warn m8000 winch, electric fan. [sold but not forgotten]

2007 jk Rubicon 2dr

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2011, 12:01:13 AM »
never driven a column shifter manual before. our 4.3l v6 CJ2a project originally had the column shifter trans but Po left the trans without the top plate on so the internals are all shot. and all the linkages are gone.
They're fun to drive because of the novelty factor.  Not many people know how to drive them so it's not like you'll have others driving your vehicle.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline aw12345

  • Member
  • Posts: 3065
    • my jeep picture page
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2011, 06:19:50 AM »
Column shift is easy to get used too now the Citroen 2cv and some of the old renaults where something else they had this Banana looking shifter coming straight out of the dash you shifted does by turning and pushing in or pulling out
2006 Jeep Wrangler TJ SE
2004 Jeep Wrangler TJ SE

Offline VA_YJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 282
  • Now I need a CJ...
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2011, 03:31:02 PM »
Us old guys used to call the column shifter "three on the tree".  It allows your girlfriend to slide closer, so it's a good thing!
95 YJ, 31 BFG ATs, 4.0 TB & spacer, Banks header, DynoMax CAT back, 19# inj, AEM CAI, 20 gal mod, Optima yellow
98 TJ, 35 BFG Krawlers, 4.0 liter, ax15, atlas 5:1, armor, Super 88 (under construction)
96 XJ Cheep Cherokee, 33s, 4.0 liter, AW4, future project
89 Waggy, 360 V8 727 dana 44s, it runs

Offline jfrabat

  • Gargantuan Mango Tree Mechanic®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3676
  • Finally USING the Jeep!
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2011, 04:18:45 PM »
Column shift is easy to get used too now the Citroen 2cv and some of the old renaults where something else they had this Banana looking shifter coming straight out of the dash you shifted does by turning and pushing in or pulling out

I remember driving a Fiat with this setup...
'94 YJ 2.5L with 4" RE lift, Superwinch EPi9.0, FoMoCo e-Fan, SD30 and SD35 w/ARB-5.13, 165A alt., 33" BFG KM2 on 15" AR wheels, Sony sound system, Pavement Ends Hardtop, Hydroboost

jramey

  • Guest
Re: Motor Trend: 1945 CJ vs. 2012 Wrangler JK
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2011, 07:40:26 PM »
Had an old 4 door dodge dart with a three on the tree, man it was fun to drive