Author Topic: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)  (Read 5463 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

melbill

  • Guest
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2010, 04:55:12 PM »


I have a '95 YJ and I have the intake on the left (looking at the picture). I am in the process of cleaning it up right now and will be opening it up for a 64mm tb this week. I guess '95s got lots of different parts some YJ some TJ depending on the line and the day it came off.  
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 04:57:51 PM by melbill »

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2010, 05:03:06 PM »

I have a '95 YJ and I have the intake on the left (looking at the picture). I am in the process of cleaning it up right now and will be opening it up for a 64mm tb this week. I guess '95s got lots of different parts some YJ some TJ depending on the line and the day it came off. 
Well, TJ's use a intake then the YJ's as there is no port for the MAP.  Most of the weird YJ's were '95.5's and not '95's as the '95's carried over into 1996.  That's when you start seeing stuff like the dual diaphragm boosters, pucks on the hoods and upgraded tailgate hinges among other things.

Anyone have a '93 or '94 and can confirm?
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline oldjeep

  • Member
  • Posts: 1800
    • www.Oldjeep.com
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2010, 05:10:19 PM »
Well, TJ's use a intake then the YJ's as there is no port for the MAP.  Most of the weird YJ's were '95.5's and not '95's as the '95's carried over into 1996.  That's when you start seeing stuff like the dual diaphragm boosters, pucks on the hoods and upgraded tailgate hinges among other things.

Anyone have a '93 or '94 and can confirm?

I've got a 94 and my Map is on the firewall.
Chuck P
The clowns'? Oh, yeah, the clowns. We fight them too — entire armies, spilling out of Volkswagons. We do our best to fight them off, but they keep sending 'em in!
94 YJ - gone
98 ZJ - sons truck
97 TJ - daughters project

www.oldjeep.com

Offline FourbangerYJ

  • Servicing Squirrels Since 1995®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3372
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2010, 05:10:59 PM »



this is off two different yj's 4 cylinders 

Mine was made in Oct. 95. I have the non square style intake (the one on the right looking at the pic). I have the TJ rubber pucks on the hood, and TJ style tailgate hinges. But I missed out on the brake booster. :brick:
Scott~

Using tools you have not used in a while is like shaking hands with old friends. :nod:

melbill

  • Guest
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #19 on: April 25, 2010, 05:26:15 PM »
They get weird. I believe mine is a  95.5 it  has the square intake, pucks on the hood, and a plugged MAP port on the tb.

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #20 on: April 25, 2010, 05:31:08 PM »
They get weird. I believe mine is a  95.5 it  has the square intake, pucks on the hood, and a plugged MAP port on the tb.
Might just be a 1995.5 thing.  Some 1995.5's don't have everything but rather have some things that are older depending on when exactly it was made.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #21 on: April 25, 2010, 05:32:19 PM »
I've got a 94 and my Map is on the firewall.
Was your intake the square or the round one?  They should all have the MAP on the firewall.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #22 on: April 25, 2010, 06:11:30 PM »
I have been reading alot about 4.0 tb upgrade but thought the intake was the only opening to be enlarged. Do both the intake and lower tb opening need to be enlarged to 64mm??

the 4.0L tb is 60mm at the top and 56mm at the bottom. you can bore out the bottom side of the t/b to 60 mm but not with a dremel or holesaw - it has to be done on a lathe or milling machine. The 62, 63 and 64mm throttle bodies are machined and enlarged from top to bottom, they require a larger butterfly to match the new diameter.
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline Bounty Hunter

  • Member
  • Posts: 1658
    • http://www.sija.org
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #23 on: April 25, 2010, 06:31:46 PM »
My spare '94 engine and my '95.5 both have the rounded base for the TB, FWIW.

I wouldn't waste your time with a 4.0L TB, go with an overbore like a 62mm for the large increase in throttle response and airflow.

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #24 on: April 25, 2010, 06:41:44 PM »
Was your intake the square or the round one?  They should all have the MAP on the firewall.

my 95 is the rounded one, same with a '94 intake that i have as a spare.

all YJs had the MAP on the firewall, would probably work with either one but the wiring would be in a different location and the plug is different also, so my guess is that's why there was no YJ with a MAP on the t/b when they start mixing them up.
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline Jeffy

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14934
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #25 on: April 25, 2010, 06:47:53 PM »
my 95 is the rounded one, same with a '94 intake that i have as a spare.

all YJs had the MAP on the firewall, would probably work with either one but the wiring would be in a different location and the plug is different also, so my guess is that's why there was no YJ with a MAP on the t/b when they start mixing them up.
They moved the MAP for 1996 XJ's and 1997 TJ's.

Seems strange that they would implement a new intake design at teh end unless they were seeing if they could lighten it or maybe cut cost on it so they could see if it would work on the TJ's before they came out.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZNlr60GXH5OlKIFrT7P6mg
My Jeep: http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php?topic=2783.0
"If the motor car were invented today, there is absolutely no way that any government in the world would let normal members of the public drive one."

Offline Bounty Hunter

  • Member
  • Posts: 1658
    • http://www.sija.org
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #26 on: April 25, 2010, 09:21:07 PM »
My 95.5 YJ stock 2.5L TB had the MAP port on the TB, with a vacuum cap.  Also had a goofy crossbreed of a mainshaft in the transfer case, didn't use caged bearings like earlier YJ's, the sprocket spun straight on the shaft like TJ's and SYE's, yet the rest of the mainshaft was pure YJ.

Offline sharpxmen

  • Chief Squirrel Blower®
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7093
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #27 on: June 25, 2010, 06:41:20 AM »
Speaking of throttle bodies. wth am i supposed to do about my 1990 2.5? there isnt shizzzle for em!!
i have one that i cannot test so i don't know how and if it works but if you're up for some testing send me a PM - have a look here http://4bangerjp.com/forums/index.php/topic,8142.msg64698.html#msg64698
'95 YJ, NSG370 6spd / Hurst shifter, Dana 300 + 4:1 Doubler / tri-stick, Custom skid, Super D35 / Auburn LSD / 4.88, 35x12.5x15 BFG KM2, 64mm t/b, 1.7 RollerRockers, MkVIII e-fan, Dual Diaph Booster
Latest: Corbeau BajaRS heated seats :dance: keeping warm the rear end

Offline Eucalypta

  • Member
  • Posts: 147
    • Eucalypta Oud-Hollands Snoepgoed
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2010, 04:20:01 AM »
I have a '94 2.5 YJ with the manifold on the left.

Today I swapped my TB with one of a 4.0L.
The flange opening in the manifold is about 56mm and the outlet of the 4.0L TB is 56mm.
By only swapping the TB's I increase the minimum air intake diameter from 48mm (outlet opening from the 2.5L TB) to 56mm.

I drove just a bit along the countryside today so cannot yet tell if it is a big improvement on the highway with a strong head wind.  ;)

I guess if you go to a full bore without changing the injectors, fuelpressure valve and possible O2 sensor, you might not gain extra power?  :puzzled:

To Boldly go where no one has gone before - James T Kirk
1994 YJ 2.5L - 1996 ZJ 5.2 V8

xjaz

  • Guest
Re: 4.0 tb conversion?....(sorry)
« Reply #29 on: July 28, 2010, 11:17:43 AM »
Speaking of throttle bodies. wth am i supposed to do about my 1990 2.5? there isnt shizzzle for em!!

Sure there is, just do the MPI conversion like this http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=950222&highlight=multi+port+injection.  Not an easy swap, and in hindsight, not really worth it.